Knowledge Networks

Our initial survey

We have got responses from 67 wildfire scientists to the following questions:

• In your opinion, which are 2 of the most pressing questions that need to be addressed to further our understanding of wildfire impacts on biogeochemical cycling in watersheds.
• What are the most important pathways towards better integrating fire science across scientific disciplines?
• What are the key roadblocks towards a more holistic understanding of the cumulative spatiotemporal impacts of wildfires in terrestrial and aquatic environments across both short and long timescales?

Text Analysis Networks

Text analysis of survey responses is here. You can zoom and move the network around!

Pressing questions

Roadblocks

Pathways

Literature network

Text analysis of abstracts from references cites in survey responses is here. You can zoom and move the network around!

Pressing questions

Roadblocks

Pathways

Feedback Prompt

Take a look at the word cloud networks & respond in the comment box in the link above!

These have been created based on your responses to the survey questions. There is a word cloud for: 1) the pressing questions 2) the roadblocks and 3) the pathways for wildfires and watershed science.

1. 🔥 What connections jump out for the burning issues? (10 words or less per “burning issue”)
2. 🔥 What connections do you see for roadblocks? (10 words or less per roadblock)
3. 🔥 What connections do you see for pathways? (10 words or less per pathway)
4. 🔥 What connections do you see across the questions? i.e. which pathways could address which roadblocks? Which burning issues could be addressed by which pathways, etc?